Sunday, February 27, 2024

SECDEF Preps the Budget Battlefield

The Secretary of Defense gave another one of his bravura performances Friday, with this speech at West Point.  Like his speech at last year's Sea, Air and Space Symposium (in which he challenged Navy and Marine Corps sacred cows before a largely naval audience), Gates showed no timidity in shaking things up for an Army audience.  Key quote for those of you keeping track of my quixotic quest to unbalance the defense budget in favor of American Seapower:

The need for heavy armor and firepower to survive, close with, and destroy the enemy will always be there, as veterans of Sadr City and Fallujah can no doubt attest.  And one of the benefits of the drawdown in Iraq is the opportunity to conduct the kind of full-spectrum training -- including mechanized combined arms exercises -- that was neglected to meet the demands of the current wars. 

Looking ahead, though, in the competition for tight defense dollars within and between the services, the Army also must confront the reality that the most plausible, high-end scenarios for the U.S. military are primarily naval and air engagements --  whether in Asia, the Persian Gulf, or elsewhere.  The strategic rationale for swift-moving expeditionary forces, be they Army or Marines, airborne infantry or special operations, is self-evident given the likelihood of counterterrorism, rapid reaction, disaster response, or stability or security force assistance missions.  But in my opinion, any future defense secretary who advises the president to again send a big American land army into Asia or into the Middle East or Africa should "have his head examined," as General MacArthur so delicately put it.
I have a feeling that were he to remain in office, Gates might actually take this one on.  I would like to see Congress hold him accountable for this statement in any upcoming testimony, by asking him to elaborate on how statements like this can serve as the impetus for change, and whether he believed such change was possible in the current Pentagon environment.

Bryan McGrath

No comments: