Entitlement and the Clinton News Network

Hat tip to CDR Salamander for laying it out well, and linking over to Doug Ross who has a ton of details. This strikes me as business as usual for the Clintons, as I sit and observe entitlement in America in action enabled by the media supposedly intended to protect the citizens from people in power, but has become the vehicle for those in power to do as they please.

CNN hits bottom and digs: All six debate questioners appear to be Democratic Party operatives. So much for "ordinary people, undecided voters".

In a nutshell, CNN's six "undecided voters" were:

A Democratic Party bigwig
An antiwar activist
A Union official
An Islamic leader
A Harry Reid staffer
A radical Chicano separatist

In other words, average voters they were not, and plants with planted questions they are.

That's pretty funny, considering the Democratic Party bigwig is actually from Arkansas. Obama and Edwards actually think they have a chance, and their voters actually think this is a fair election. This is the Clinton's though, and the Clinton News Network; it was never going to be a fair fight. The name of the game is entitlement, the media is going to not ask about her campaign massive contributions from Chinese busboys, is not going to call her out on flip flopping, and is not going to put her in another situation in a debate where she might have it tough.

Politics has taken a strange turn somewhere over the last decade. The chaos on the right is contributing to a higher quality primary as they the right chooses its candidate because disorganized voting blocks like religious groups do not all agree on whom to support, and can't be counted on to vote in large blocks.

Ironically, the incredible organization on the left has made it easier for large left wing voting blocks to be controlled and manipulated, and has ultimately led to silencing information and criticism the voter might need to know to make an informed decision when choosing the best candidate.