Saturday, May 3, 2024

5th Fleet Focus: Order of Battle

Order of Battle in the 5th Fleet Area of Responsibility.

The Truman Carrier Strike Group

USS Harry S. Truman (CVN 75)
USS San Jacinto (CG 56) - 6th Fleet
USS Hue City (CG 66)
USS Carney (DDG 64)
USS Oscar Austin (DDG 79)
USS Winston S. Churchill (DDG 81)
HMS Manchester (D95)
USNS Arctic (T-AOE 8)


Abraham Lincoln Carrier Strike Group

USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN 72)
USS Mobile Bay (CG 53)
USS Russell (DDG 59)
USS Shoup (DDG 86)
USS Momsen (DDG 92)
USS Curts (FFG 38)


Nassau Expeditionary Strike Group

USS Nassau (LHA 4)
USS Ashland (LSD 48)
USS Nashville (LPD 13)
USS Philippine Sea (CG 58)
USS Ross (DDG 71)
USS Bulkeley (DDG 84)


Orion 08 Strike Group

HMS Illustrious (R06)
HMS Edinburgh (D97)
HMS Westminster (F237)
HMS Trafalgar (S107)
USS Cole (DDG 67)
FS Jean Bart (D615)
SPS Mendez Nunez (F104)


In Theater

Ocean 6
FGS Emden (F 210)
FGS Hamburg (F220)
FGS Koeln (F 211)
HNLMS Evertsen (F 805)
ITS Commandante Borsini (P491)
FS Guepratte (F714)
FS Commandant Bouan (F797)
USS Oak Hill (LSD 51)
HMS Chatham (F87)
HMS Montrose (F236)
HMAS Arunta (FFH 151)
BRNS Sabha (FFGHM 90)
USS Scout (MCM 8)
USS Gladiator (MCM 11)
USS Ardent (MCM 12)
USS Dexterous (MCM 13)
HMS Ramsay (M 110)
HMS Blyth (M 111)
HMS Atherstone (M38)
HMS Chiddingfold (M37)

Notes: By next week, the Truman CSG and several European ships will no longer be in the region. The Truman CSG has already left the Gulf.

Friday, May 2, 2024

HSV Swift Gets New Contract

From todays list of DoD contracts:
Sealift, Inc., Oyster Bay, N.Y., is being awarded a $21,913,900 firm-fixed-price contract for the 12-month charter of the U.S.-flagged, contractor-operated, high speed vessel, HSV Swift. HSV Swift will be operated worldwide in support of U.S. Fleet Forces Command and the war on terrorism. The vessel will also be used for emerging operational concepts such as seabasing and the Global Fleet Station. The contract contains four options, which include three 12-month options and one 11-month option, which if exercised, would bring the total contract value to $93,076,577. Work will be performed worldwide, and work is expected to be completed Sept. 2009 (Aug. 2013 with options exercised). Contract funds will expire at the end of the current fiscal year. This contract was competitively procured with more than 80 proposals solicited and one offer received. The U.S. Navy’s Military Sealift Command, Washington, D.C., is the contracting authority (N00033-08-C-3315).

$21,913,900 and up to $93,076,577 for 59 months strikes us as unusually high for a charter like this. Is HSV Swift being upgraded? Could be the last charter underestimated the costs?

Still, for the operational tempo of this vessel, it is still a good deal. If all options are exercised, HSV Swift will be operational until after the JHSV comes online.

HT: LW

Observing the 24th Marine Expeditionary Unit Offensive

In early April, red tape was holding back the 24th Marine Expeditionary Unit. It was reported the hangup was caused by "disagreements and coordination problems high within the international military command." A week later the news from the 24th MEU was that a roadside bomb hit a convoy, killing 2 and injuring 2.

Ten days later the Marines were finally given the green light. According to Defense News, in a dawn attack on April 29th, the Marines stormed the provincial capital of Gamsir (sometimes spelt "Garmser"). The action started on Tuesday, with the troops securing routes into the town in the south of Helmand province. Helmand province, a British controlled area of Afghanistan, is the world's largest opium producing region and the region is infested with insurgent activity. The Guardian noted the deployment to southern Helmand province is the first major US operation in the area since late 2001, when US soldiers touched down at a remote airstrip in southern Helmand.

Todays news of the 23th MEU activity comes from the International Herald Tribune, which has additional information of the region.
Most of the 33,000 U.S. troops in Afghanistan operate in the east, along the border with Pakistan, but the 7,500 British troops in Helmand and 2,500 Canadian troops in neighboring Kandahar province have not proved a large enough force to tame the south. The British have a small outpost on Garmser's northern tip, NATO has no presence south of that.
IHT notes the Marines are opening convoy roads to the south and will not be in the region long, meaning since this has been reported, the Marines have already moved. We really like the reporting in the IHT, the article does a good job of highlighting the unique capabilities the Marines have brought with them to Afghanistan, and notes some tactical differences between Afghanistan and Iraq. Unlike the British and Canadian forces in the region, the Marines bring with them their own dedicated air power. Unlike Iraq, the Marines are able to utilize more deadly artillery and mortars in the wide open areas due to the lack of sprawling civilians they dealt with in Iraq.

Defense of the Realm has some excellent analysis of the 24th MEUs early activities, and concludes with an interesting point.
The news of this success, which has eluded British forces, comes a day after The Daily Telegraph published details of a downbeat confidential Foreign and Commonwealth Office paper, which listed “a catalogue of problems and weaknesses in Western attempts to stabilise the country.”

In a list of "critical areas to fill", the paper claimed that Nato still needed three infantry battalions, more helicopters, more aircraft and more training teams to help the Afghan army. Intriguingly, it also raises concerns about the situation after November, when the US Marines currently engaged in the Garmsir operation are to be withdrawn from the south.

That latter concern is presumably now less pressing. The presumption had been - without any evidence to support it - that the assault on Garmsir would have been held over until 16 Air Assault Brigade was fully in place, to give the publicity-hungry Paras a chance of the glory, of which they had been deprived by the capture of Musa Qala by 52 Infantry Brigade last December.

With the US Marines declining to wait, they now have the opportunity to pacify the region and, it is anticipated, to push the Taleban back to the Pakistan border in Helmand, assisting the control of Taleban infiltration at the border.
Opportunity being the key word, we believe it is still very early and premature to assume success. Early signs are good, and we do see something new here very worthy of observing in detail, as the Marines allow.

We observe the shift of the 24th Marine Expeditionary Unit, a veteran force of seasoned Marines well schooled in counter-insurgency that brings a unique air-ground synchronized firepower capability to a new theater of war, as an interesting development in the war in Afghanistan. While it is true Army units have served in both places, most units that rotate into Afghanistan are very similar to units that rotate out. Marines are different, everything is mobile, CAS is integrated, but in addition to the Marine close air support units, the same Air Force and Navy air support that supports the Army is available as well.

With the Marines kicking down the door, it raises a lot of opportunity to do some good work in rooting out the region when the British 16 Air Assault Brigade is fully in place. While we don't know if that is indeed the plan of action here, the Marines are very efficient killers, and if the 16 Air Assault Brigade (or some other force) is providing on the spot counter-insurgency behind the Marines, keeping logistics trains open as they push all the way to the south, Helmand province could be a place to keep an eye on.

Many recently have suggested counter-insurgency will not work in Afghanistan. Michael Yon highlighted this article in Spectator as one example, which claims the only way out is to talk to the Taleban. We default to the professionals for developing strategies in Afghanistan, but we get the impression the Marines have a different strategy. We are looking forward to seeing what they can do with this small Afghanistan surge.

Photo: David Guttenfelder / The Associated Press

Five Thoughts on Friday

Listed are five Friday morning observations.

Big Money in AFRICOM? You don't have an expo where the defense industry arrives in force unless there is money to be made. This is a good sign though, because AFRICOM is about economic development despite what you have probably read. Few people realize who has been the head political minds behind AFRICOM, but the short list includes Senator Russ Feingold and Senator Barak Obama. We find it ironic two of the most progressive Senators in our nation are the big political guns behind AFRICOM, and it is typically the progressives in politics who know the least about what AFRICOM is about.

USS North Carolina Commissioning. If you are looking for information regarding the USS North Carolina (SSN 777) commissioning your one stop spot for every bit of information is the Sub Report. Eric has an entire section set up on the site to some amazing links. Once again, the Sub Report has delivered the best coverage of a submarine event on the internet.

A Great Official Navy Website. We have talked about a number of official Navy websites that have had a facelift this year, particularly ships that have been making deployments. One of the best official Navy websites to get an update this year is Commander Submarine Group 7. Without question, and it isn't even close, the coolest most informative and interesting official submarine website on the internet. If you know the name of person behind this brilliance, please post in the comments, because someone deserves public credit and appreciation.

Combined Endeavor 2008. Official description: This annual, United States European Command (USEUCOM)-sponsored exercise is “in the spirit of” the Partnership for Peace (PfP) C4 Integration and Interoperability Exercise. CE enables interoperability between U.S. and NATO / PfP military C4 equipment by documenting and exercising technical and procedural solutions.

Best Read of the Day. When Eagle1 talks Port Security, it is usually the most informed, in depth, and smartest thing you will read on the internet on the topic, and this contribution is no exception. We read the new small boat strategy DHS put out, and I was not impressed. A bit too much hype in my opinion on the small boat nuke threat. It is a start, but we think it gives a bit too much focus to the least likely threats a bit too little to the more likely, inexpensive threats that are more aligned to the tactics of criminals and pirates, which terrorists can mimic. Eagle1s analysis of mine issues for port security

Senate Bill Business as Usual

For all the talk about a high minded Senate, FY09 budget marks the eighth year in a row George Bush got exactly what he asked for with no changes regarding the Navy shipbuilding request. All these people who claim George Bush is weak clearly failed to observe how he has had the Senate Armed Services Committee by the jock strap for both of his terms. This news sets up a fight for the eighth straight year in committee.
The Senate Armed Services Committee unveiled a defense bill Thursday that makes no attempt to add ships to the Navy's fleet next year beyond what the Pentagon had requested.

Faced with a dwindling fleet, some key House members have discussed the idea of adding ships to next year's budget, possibly by buying more older-model destroyers.

But the Senate committee's version of the annual defense policy bill preserves the Navy's request for 7 ships, a move that could set the stage for negotiations later this year with the House over shipbuilding needs.

Today's fleet of 279 ships is the smallest in a century, but the ever-rising costs of ship construction has limited congressional options for rebuilding the fleet.
The fast track to 200 ships continues. If the FY09 budget passes, that means the combined total of ships build under the 2 terms of the Clinton Administration and Bush Jr. Administration is 92. During some of the best 16 economic years in our nations history, and the nation can only produce 92 ships. The next President of the United States will decide what kind of Navy the United States will have in the 21st century. Of the three candidates, which one will recognize the dwindling number of ships as a major problem? That's a rhetorical question, because any answer is speculation.

While conventional wisdom suggests McCain would be that candidate, I haven't seen any evidence this is true, and McCain supported the decision outlined above. Obama hasn't discussed the subject, but has also never been asked about the issue. Hillary Clinton's husband left a record that should give everyone pause, but she has neither been asked nor offered any attention to the subject either.

We observe this could be a political issue Obama could beat both Clinton, Bush, and McCain over the head with, and get a boost from the shipbuilders union at the same time. It would also change the spin in the political election today and resonate well in the remaining primary states. Wishful thinking though, we don't believe Obama has any vision when it comes to the military, and specifically to the Navy, so we hold out little hope he is even aware of the problems in this regard.