Saturday, January 26, 2024

Video From Russian Naval Exercise

What, you don't speak Russian? Well that's ok, you'll still be able to figure out what's happening in this video from Russian TV.

Enjoy. I had to pause a few times to let the stream pre load.

To start the movie, hit the picture of the Moskva on the right.

HT: CaptainMaxwell at HHQ

5th Fleet Focus: Order of Battle

Order of Battle in the 5th Fleet Area of Responsibility.

The Truman Carrier Strike Group

USS Harry S. Truman (CVN 75)
USS San Jacinto (CG 56) - 6th Fleet
USS Hue City (CG 66)
USS Carney (DDG 64)
USS Oscar Austin (DDG 79)
USS Winston S. Churchill (DDG 81)
HMS Manchester (D95)
HMCS Charlottetown (FFH 339)
USNS Arctic (T-AOE 8)
USS Montpelier (SSN 765)


Tarawa Expeditionary Strike Group

USS Tarawa (LHA 1)
USS Cleveland (LPD 7)
USS Germantown (LSD 42)
USS Port Royal (CG 73)
USS Hopper (DDG 70)
USS Ingraham (FFG 61)


In Theater

Ocean 6
FGS Augsburg (F 213)
FS Guepratte (F714)
FS Commandant Ducuing (F795)
FS Premier Maitre L'Her (F792)
USS Whidbey Island (LSD 41)
HMS Campbeltown (F86)
HMS Argyll (F231)
HMAS Arunta (FFH 151)
USS Scout (MCM 8)
USS Gladiator (MCM 11)
USS Ardent (MCM 12)
USS Dexterous (MCM 13)
HMS Ramsay (M 110)
HMS Blyth (M 111)

Friday, January 25, 2024

Those Loose Air Force Nukes

What Happened at Minot--an In From the Cold Special Report.

"Nathan Hale" breaks a story. This caught my attention.

“Only one nuke troop was promoted to Chief Master Sergeant (E-9) last year. Why stay in a career field where your chances of getting promoted are so low? They have cross-trained senior NCOs from missile maintenance and even supply to fill the [nuclear] ranks because the Air Force is cutting manpower in favor of UAVs and fighters.”

The result, he says, is a career field where experience levels are dropping, particularly among the NCOs and officers who provide critical leadership.

“No officer wants to be in nukes,” the source explained. “It’s boring, picky, and can be a real career ender. The glory is in the war. Even conventional munitions is better because they get a chance to deploy to the Middle East and build up bombs for combat. Nuke techs are a drag on resources because they typically don’t deploy. Senior officers fill the key slots just to fill a square on their resumes.”

Whenever the most dangerous, most critical, and most deadly aspect of your military branch becomes the least desirable for the highest quality people of your service, it is an invitation to mistakes. Considering the topic is nuclear weapons on US soil, mistakes are simply not an option.

There is a promotion process problem in the DoD that someone needs to get on top of, and it isn't just the Air Force. It is becoming too similar to the processes of promotion we see too often in public service, a seriously flawed government system of politics that all too often leads to accountability problems, a process in which an entity loses sight of its business priorities. When nukes go flying away unaccounted for on an air force base in the United States due to a leadership issue, the USAF has lost sight of its business priorities.

5th Fleet Focus: The European Surge

Following the conflict fought in 2006 between Israel and Lebanon, the Europeans shifted their naval deployment strategy. With a UNIFIL commitment and a lot of attention being paid to troop movements into the UNIFIL areas, the European Navies moved to support the UN peacekeeping operation. Since the conclusion of that conflict, only Britain, Germany, and France have operated warships for any extended period of time south of the Suez canal.

During that same period, Pakistan had increased their presence in Task Force 150, while Australia and Singapore have continuously deployed their naval forces to support Task Force 158 in the Northern Persian Gulf. The US Navy filled the gaps with a number of surges to the region while the Europeans dealt with the situation in Lebanon.

When we began the blog in June of 2007, our first Order of Battle for the 5th Fleet AOR indicates there were 2 CVNs, 3 CGs, 7 DDGs, 1 FFG, 1 LHD, 1 LPD, 2 LSDs, and 4 MCMs bringing the total theater contribution to 21 US Navy ships. Allied contributions however highlighted a different story, the Royal Navy had 2 frigates and 2 minesweepers, while Germany, France, and Australia each had only one frigate deployed regionally. Of the US naval forces listed, 1 CVN, 1 CG, 2 DDGs, 1 FFG, and 1 LSD were surge deployments.

In 2008 the European Navies are returning to the Indian Ocean and Persian Gulf. We have previously discussed both the Orion 08 deployment and the German Training Cruise Flotilla, but we can now add the Italian Medal 08 deployment. In all, the United Kingdom, France, Spain, Germany, and Italy are deploying an aircraft carrier, 8 warships, and 2 minesweepers to the AOR by late February, and none are replacing the 6 European warships and 2 minesweepers already in the region. That is just the Europeans; Canada, Australia, and Japan all either have forces in the region, or on their way.

Why is this noteworthy? Because unless the US has a hidden Strike Group somewhere, by this time next month there will be more allied naval forces in the 5th Fleet AOR than US naval forces since 2001. We list the forces by nation:

US Navy
USS Harry S. Truman (CVN 75)
USS San Jacinto (CG 56) (*Black Sea)
USS Hue City (CG 66)
USS Carney (DDG 64)
USS Oscar Austin (DDG 79)
USS Winston S. Churchill (DDG 81)
USS Tarawa (LHA 1)
USS Cleveland (LPD 7)
USS Germantown (LSD 42)
USS Port Royal (CG 73)
USS Hopper (DDG 70)
USS Ingraham (FFG 61)
USS Cole (DDG 67)
USS Whidbey Island (LSD 41)
USS Scout (MCM 8)
USS Gladiator (MCM 11)
USS Ardent (MCM 12)
USS Dexterous (MCM 13)

(submarines and support ships not listed)

Royal Navy
HMS Illustrious (R06)
HMS Edinburgh (D97)
HMS Manchester (D95)
HMS Westminster (F237)
HMS Campbeltown (F86)
HMS Atherstone (M38)
HMS Chiddingfold (M37)
HMS Ramsay (M 110)
HMS Blyth (M 111)

(submarines and support ships not listed)

France
FS Jean Bart (D615)
FS Surcouf (F711)
FS Guepratte (F714)
FS Commandant Ducuing (F795)
FS Premier Maitre L'Her (F792)

(submarines and support ships not listed)

Germany
FGS Augsburg (F 213)
FGS Hamburg (F 220)
FGS Köln (F 211)

(support ships not listed)

Italy
Comandante Borsini (P 491)

(support ships not listed)

Spain
SPS Mendez Nunez (F104)

Canada
HMCS Charlottetown (FFH 339)

Australia
HMAS Arunta (FFH 151)

Japan
JDS Murasame (DD 101)

(support ships not listed)

By my count the US Navy has 18 if you include the USS San Jacinto (CG 56), while Europe has 19, and Japan, Canada, and Australia combine for 3. By the way, I've done the math on the various support and command ships as well, and it looks like without counting Japan the numbers are close to equal in that regard as well.

This may not be the top number for the Europeans either, the Mistral will be making its deployment to Asia in February, the Dutch and the Danes both have deployments to the region scheduled for 2008, and the US Navy Global Fleet Station off east Africa is expected to begin this spring.

We note that come February 2008, the US Navy will have reduced the number of ships by 3 since June 2007, but allied nations will have increased their naval presence from 7 ships to at least 20, with Japan operating one ship and one support ship during both time periods. I don't know what you would call a three fold increase of naval power by the Europeans to the Indian Ocean, but we call it a European Surge.

Thursday, January 24, 2024

What Gates and Bono Have In Common

In From the Cold has an interesting post up regarding the recent visit by Bono to the Pentagon, apparently where Bono had a 20 minute meeting with Secretary of Defense Gates. George Smiley (you have to love the spook nicknames) approaches the development with a healthy mix of skepticism and potential, and if it was anyone but Gates I would almost certain dismiss this as a development without a second thought, but our observation of Gates is 'he is one clever bastard' and we consider him one of the most impressive Presidential appointments in decades. Reuters has the story.

U2 lead singer and activist Bono visited the Pentagon to discuss Africa and the fight against global poverty with U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates, representatives of the two men said on Wednesday.

Among the topics at the 20-minute meeting on Tuesday afternoon were U.S. plans to set up a new U.S. military command for Africa, Pentagon press secretary Geoff Morrell said.

"I think this was a chance for two people who care about the problems facing the continent of Africa to talk about their shared interest in solving those problems," Morrell said of the meeting that was not publicized in advance.

A spokeswoman for DATA, the group co-founded by Bono to fight poverty and AIDS in Africa, said the singer had been in Washington to meet members of budget committees in Congress.


One could assume that this perhaps has something to do with AFRICOM, and it indeed may, but if Gates had done his homework and we are almost certain he does, he would have recognized that DATA is about AIDS, and when you are talking about AIDS one of the largest areas where AIDS related non governmental organizations have set up shop is in the nations around the Gulf of Guinea. It just so happens, the Navy is in that theater and AIDS is on the agenda. It's called the African Partnership Station, and it is unlikely Bono knows what he should about its purpose.

Consider this, the same week Gates is meeting with Bono about "issues involving poverty in Africa", the same Bono who sponsors one of the largest high profile AIDS organizations in the world (DATA), the USS Fort McHenry (LSD 43) is pulling into Sao Tome and Principe, a nation well known for AIDS issues.

We have discussed the African Partnership Station on this blog many times, but early on we specifically highlighted the desire of an international partnered, joint agency, and non-governmental organization approach, and in our example we specifically cited AIDS in in Sao Tome and Principe. At the time I discussed an observation made by a friend of mine who works in AIDS relief for an NGO in Sao Tome and Principe.

In that area there is a stigma from people regarding others with AIDS, and it leads to people with AIDS not getting treatments because they don't want others to know they have it.

He sees some of the other NGOs demonstrating the same stigma towards the API. While all the NGOs are trying to breakdown the stigma of AIDS, he sees some of the NGOs in hypocrisy because of their stigma over the US military.

The only weakness observed to date with the Global Fleet Station approach, and in particular the African Partnership Initiative is getting the NGOs to get involved. The European NGOs in particular are so skeptical of the US Military based on their perception of credibility issues that they would rather not work with the Americans for no other reason than their personal bias against the military.

If the African Partnership Initiative was able to get DATA involved in the process, and produce positive press regarding the enabling capability the US Navy can offer in their capacity, it could potentially break down the skepticism the Navy is encountering from the European NGOs and truly bridge the gap in creating a joint approach. The Navy desires to be the security enabler for the host nation, but also a logistical enabler for NGO contribution, leveraging civilian rather than military cooperation as a force enabler in connecting to African nations.

Did Gates and Bono discuss the African Partnership Initiative? Of the number of discussions about Africa where Gates and Bono could find common cause, we certainly believe it is one of the more likely topics the two could discuss and both contribute to the 20 minute discussion.